It is tricky to find a good set of parameters for a specific workload. Select Accept cookies to consent to this use or Manage preferences to make your cookie choices. Capabilities/Features. This post looks at two popular engines, Hive and Presto, and assesses the best uses for each. Hive translates SQL queries into multiple stages of MapReduce and it is powerful enough to handle huge numbers of jobs (Although as Arun C Murthy pointed out, modern Hive runs on Tez whose computational model is similar to Spark’s). Presto scales better than Hive and Spark for concurrent queries. These choices are available either as open source options or as part of proprietary solutions like AWS EMR. InfoWorld While SQL is the common langue of many data queries, not all engines that use SQL are the same—and their effectiveness changes based on your particular use case. In this article, we will describe an approach to determine a good set of parameters for SQL workloads and some surprising insights that we gained in the process.. This article focuses on describing the history and various features of both products. It was designed by Facebook people. Andrew C. Oliver is a columnist and software developer with a long history in open source, database, and cloud computing. Apache Spark. Financial Services Institutions might consider leveraging different engines for different query patterns and use cases. Hive and Spark are two very popular and successful products for processing large-scale data sets. Presto vs. Hive. 4. Hive has its special ability of frequent switching between engines and so is an efficient tool for querying large data sets. The Complete Buyer's Guide for a Semantic Layer. Subscribe to access expert insight on business technology - in an ad-free environment. 3. Spark is a fast and general processing engine compatible with Hadoop data. HDInsight Spark is faster than Presto. Aerospike is an open-source, modern database built from the ground up to push the limits of flash storage, processors and networks. MapReduce is fault-tolerant since it stores the intermediate results into disks and … I spoke to Joshua Klar, AtScale's vice president of product management, and he noted that many of the company's customers use two engines. Cluster Setup:. This allows inserting data into an existing partition without having to rewrite the entire partition, and improves the performance of writes by not requiring the creation of files for empty buckets. |. “Benchmark: Spark SQL VS Presto” is published by Hao Gao in Hadoop Noob. Presto scales better than Hive and Spark for concurrent queries. As the data size grows over time, resources needed for processing also have to be bumped up proportionally to meet the SLA, and it is easier said than done in an on-premise environment where dynamic provisioning of resources on-demand may not be possible. In this article, we will describe an approach to determine a good set of parameters for SQL workloads and some surprising insights that we gained in the process.. Overall those systems based on Hive are much faster and more stable than Presto and S… Developers describe Aerospike as " Flash-optimized in-memory open source NoSQL database ". By using this site, you agree to this use. Specifically, it allows any number of files per bucket, including zero. You can change your cookie choices and withdraw your consent in your settings at any time. Introduction. Presto is consistently faster than Hive and SparkSQL for all the queries. Hive leverages MapReduce capabilities to perform distributed querying, while SparkSQL and Presto are in-memory processing distributed processing engines, so it is definitely unfair to compare Hive with SparkSQL and Presto. While SQL is the common langue of many data queries, not all engines that use SQL are the same—and their effectiveness changes based on your particular use case. Its memory-processing power is high. This website uses cookies to improve service and provide tailored ads. While Apache Hive and Spark SQL perform the same action, retrieving data, each does the task in a different way. Download InfoWorld’s ultimate R data.table cheat sheet, 14 technology winners and losers, post-COVID-19, COVID-19 crisis accelerates rise of virtual call centers, Q&A: Box CEO Aaron Levie looks at the future of remote work, Rethinking collaboration: 6 vendors offer new paths to remote work, Amid the pandemic, using trust to fight shadow IT, 5 tips for running a successful virtual meeting, CIOs reshape IT priorities in wake of COVID-19, Bossie Awards 2016: The best open source big data tools, How different SQL-on-Hadoop engines satisfy BI workloads, Sponsored item title goes here as designed, Take a closer look at your Spark implementation, AtScale released its Q4 benchmark results for the major big data SQL engines, Unleash the power of SQL with 17 tips for faster queries, Stay up to date with InfoWorld’s newsletters for software developers, analysts, database programmers, and data scientists, Get expert insights from our member-only Insider articles. Impala Vs. SparkSQL. Hive and Spark do better on long-running analytics queries. Spark 2.0 improved its large query performance by an average of 2.4X over Spark 1.6 (so upgrade!). Spark SQL gives flexibility in integration with other data … So what engine is best for your business to build around? In our previous article,we use the TPC-DS benchmark to compare the performance of five SQL-on-Hadoop systems: Hive-LLAP, Presto, SparkSQL, Hive on Tez, and Hive on MR3.As it uses both sequential tests and concurrency tests across three separate clusters, we believe that the performance evaluation is thorough and comprehensive enough to closely reflect the current state in the SQL-on-Hadoop landscape.Our key findings are: 1. ... Ahana Goes GA with Presto on AWS 9 December 2020, Datanami. Presto is for interactive simple queries, where Hive is for reliable processing. Hive is the one of the original query engines which shipped with Apache Hadoop. Execution engines like M/R, Tez, Presto and Spark provide a set of knobs or configuration parameters that control the behavior of the execution engine. JOIN operations between very large tables increased query processing time for all engines. Today AtScale released its Q4 benchmark results for the major big data SQL engines: Spark, Impala, Hive/Tez, and Presto.. DBMS > Apache Druid vs. Hive vs. … While interesting in their own right, these questions are particularly relevant to industrial practitioners who want to adopt the most appropriate technology to m… AtScale recently performed benchmark tests on the Hadoop engines Spark, Impala, Hive, and Presto. Check out this white paper comparing 3 popular SQL engines—Hive, Spark, and Presto—to see which is best for you. The cluster runs version 2.8.5 of Amazon's Hadoop distribution, Hive 2.3.4, Presto 0.214 and Spark 2.4.0. Hive, Presto, and Spark SQL Engine Configuration Learn about an approach to determine a good set of parameters for SQL workloads and some surprising insights that we gained in the process. So we will discuss Apache Hive vs Spark SQL on the basis of their feature. These choices are available either as open source options or as part of proprietary solutions like AWS EMR. Hive has its special ability of frequent switching between engines and so is an efficient tool for querying large data sets. Either way, it is time to upgrade! Among the many tools found with Spark in the big data stable are NoSQL, Hive, Pig, and Presto. If you're using Hive, this isn't an upgrade you can afford to skip. Spark SQL is a distributed in-memory computation engine. HDInsight Interactive Query is faster than Spark. It really depends on the type of query you’re executing, environment and engine tuning parameters. Copyright © 2016 IDG Communications, Inc. Impala is faster than Hive because it’s a whole different engine and Hive is over MapReduce (which is very slow due to its too many disk I/O operations). Spark SQL. As the number of joins increases, Presto and Spark SQL are more likely to perform best. Big data face-off: Spark vs. Impala vs. Hive vs. Presto. Distributed SQL Query Engines for Big data like Hive, Presto, Impala and SparkSQL are gaining more prominence in the Financial Services space, especially for liquidity risk management. In general, it is hard to say if Presto is definitely faster or slower than Spark SQL. Big data face-off: Spark vs. Impala vs. Hive vs. Presto AtScale, a maker of big data reporting tools, has published speed tests on the latest versions of the top four big data SQL engines. Hive and Spark are both immensely popular tools in the big data world. That means is highly optimized just for SQL query execution vs Spark being a general purpose execution framework that is able to run multiple different workloads such as ETL, Machine Learning etc. Presto. It’s just that Spark SQL can be seen to be a developer-friendly Spark based API which is aimed to make the programming easier. Yes, SparkSQL is much faster than Hive, especially if it performs only in-memory … In my experience, the stability gap between Spark and Hive closed a while ago, so long as you're smart about memory management. Aug 5th, 2019. If you have a fact-dim join, presto is great..however for fact-fact joins presto is not the solution.. Maximum Cumulative Outflow analysis is usually dictated by strict SLA, hence most Financial Services Institutions leverage distributed SQL query engine for processing. Big data face-off: Spark vs. Impala vs. Hive vs. Presto. We cannot say that Apache Spark SQL is the replacement for Hive or vice-versa. For small … Hive is the one of the original query engines which shipped with Apache Hadoop. It can run in Hadoop clusters through YARN or Spark's standalone mode, and it can process data in HDFS, HBase, Cassandra, Hive, and any Hadoop InputFormat. Presto is consistently faster than Hive and SparkSQL for all the queries. For more information, see our Cookie Policy. Execution engines like M/R, Tez, Presto and Spark provide a set of knobs or configuration parameters that control the behavior of the execution engine. Hive was also introduced as a … While all of the engines have shown improvement over the last AtScale benchmark, Hive/Tez with the new LLAP (Live Long and Process) feature has made impressive gains across the board. Both Impala and Presto continue lead in BI-type queries and Spark leads performance-wise in large analytics queries. The cluster runs version 2.8.5 of Amazon's Hadoop distribution, Hive 2.3.4, Presto 0.214 and Spark 2.4.0. Interactive Query preforms well with high concurrency. Copyright © 2021 IDG Communications, Inc. Presto scales better than Hive and Spark for concurrent queries. Each engine has its strengths: Presto's and SparkSQL's concurrency scaling support, SparkSQL's handling of large joins, Hive's consistency across multiple query types. If you have a fact-dim join, presto is great..however for fact-fact joins presto is not the solution.. Presto is a great replacement for proprietary technology like … I'd like to see what could be done to address the concurrency issue with memory tuning, but that's actually consistent with what I observed in the Google Dataflow/Spark Benchmark released by my former employer earlier this year. Text caching in Interactive Query, without converting data to ORC or Parquet, is equivalent to warm Spark performance. Presto queries can generally run faster than Spark queries because Presto has no built-in fault-tolerance. As Hadoop matures, FSIs are starting to use this powerful platform to serve more diverse workloads. In this post, I will compare the three most popular such engines, namely Hive, Presto and Spark. DBMS > Hive vs. The findings prove a lot of what we already know: Impala is better for needles in moderate-size haystacks, even when there are a lot of users. Though, MySQL is planned for online operations requiring many reads and writes. Conclusion. In addition, one trade-off Presto makes to achieve lower latency for … AWS EMR provides a managed Hadoop framework that makes it easy, fast, and cost-effective to process vast amounts of data across dynamically scalable Amazon EC2 instances. And each tool is designed with a specific use case in mind. In other words, they do big data analytics. Cluster Setup:. That's the reason we did not finish all the tests with Hive. The findings prove a lot of what we already know: Impala is better for needles in moderate-size haystacks, even when there are a lot of users. Today AtScale released its Q4 benchmark results for the major big data SQL engines: Spark, Impala, Hive/Tez, and Presto. It is tricky to find a good set of parameters for a specific workload. So what engine is best for your business to build around? Apache Hive provides SQL like interface to stored data of HDP. The full benchmark report is worth reading, but key highlights include: Not really analyzed is whether SQL is always the right way to go and how, say, a functional approach in Spark would compare. The final price I paid for all 21 machines was $1.55 / hour including the cost of the 400 GB EBS volume on the master node. Distributed SQL Query Engines benchmarked: Hive (Map Reduce), SparkSQL (In-Memory), Presto (In-Memory), AWS EMR Instance Type: 1* Master Node & 3* Task Node - r3.8xlarge, Table Format: Hive Table with Partitioning. by Hive remained the slowest competitor for most executions while the fight was much closer between Presto and Spark. By Andrew C. Oliver, Hive 2.1 with LLAP is over 3.4X faster than 1.2, and its small query performance doubled. Next. Apache Spark. The bottom line is that all of these engines have dramatically improved in one year. All nodes are spot instances to keep the cost down. Previous. Presto vs. Hive Presto originated at Facebook back in 2012. The performance still hasn't caught up with Impala and Spark, but according to this benchmark, it isn't as slow and unwieldy as before -- and at least Hive/Tez with LLAP is now practical to use in BI scenarios. Apache Spark vs Presto. Get a thorough walkthrough of the different approaches to selecting, buying, and implementing a semantic layer for your analytics stack, and a checklist you can refer to as you start your search. Interactive query is most suitable to run on large scale data as this was the only engine which could run all TPCDS 99 queries derived from the TPC-DS benchmark without any modifications at 100TB scale 5. This blog totally aims at differences between Spark SQL vs Hive in Apache Spar… Aerospike vs Presto: What are the differences? Spark SQL. How fast or slow is Hive-LLAP in comparison with Presto, SparkSQL, or Hive on Tez? Today AtScale released its Q4 benchmark results for the major big data SQL engines: Spark, Impala, Hive/Tez, and Presto.. Maximum Cumulative Outflow is one of the key analysis techniques to measure liquidity risk. ... Ahana Goes GA with Presto on AWS 9 December 2020, Datanami. In this post, I will compare the three most popular such engines, namely Hive, Presto and Spark. We cannot say that Apache Spark SQL is the replacement for Hive or vice-versa. We and third parties such as our customers, partners, and service providers use cookies and similar technologies ("cookies") to provide and secure our Services, to understand and improve their performance, and to serve relevant ads (including job ads) on and off LinkedIn. ... Presto is for interactive simple queries, where Hive is for reliable processing. Hive. Generally they view Hive as more stable and prefer it for their long-running queries. For small queries Hive performs better than SparkSQL consistently. In an era of cheap memory, if you can afford to do large-scale analytics, you can afford to do it in-memory, and everything else is more of a BI pattern. The findings prove a lot of what we already know: Impala is better for needles in moderate-size haystacks, even when there are a lot of users. How Hive Works. He also helped with marketing in startups including JBoss, Lucidworks, and Couchbase. Impala 2.6 is 2.8X as fast for large queries as version 2.3. In this article, we'll take a look at the performance difference between Hive, Presto, and SparkSQL on AWS EMR running a set of queries on Hive table stored in parquet format. For small queries Hive performs better than SparkSQL consistently. Apache Hive and Presto are both analytics engines that businesses can use to generate insights and enable data analytics. All nodes are spot instances to keep the cost down. Hive is the best option for performing data analytics on large volumes of data using SQL. It’s just that Spark SQL can be seen to be a developer-friendly Spark based API which is aimed to make the programming easier. All of its Hive customers use Tez, and none use MapReduce any longer. Increased query selectivity resulted in reduced query processing time. Spark… Conclusion. However, what I see in the industry(Uber, Neflixexamples) Presto is used as ad-hock SQL analytics whereas Spark … Hive. 4. We often ask questions on the performance of SQL-on-Hadoop systems: 1. Daniel Berman. learn hive - hive tutorial - apache hive - hive vs presto - hive examples. Hive vs Spark SQL: Hive-LLAP, Hive on MR3, Spark SQL 2.3.2; Hive Performance: Hive-LLAP in HDP 3.1.4 vs Hive 3/4 on MR3 0.10; Presto vs Hive on MR3 (Presto 317 vs Hive on MR3 0.10) Correctness of Hive on MR3, Presto, and Impala; Performance Evaluation of Impala, Presto, and Hive on MR3 Our visitors often compare Hive and Spark SQL with Impala, Snowflake and MongoDB. Armed with the right tool(s) for the right job, organizations both large and small can leverage the power of … 2. Presto also does well here. 2. Hadoop is no longer just a batch-processing platform for data science and machine learning use cases – it has evolved into a multi-purpose data platform for operational reporting, exploratory analysis, and real-time decision support. Check out this white paper comparing 3 popular SQL engines—Hive, Spark, and Presto—to see which is best for you. 117 Ratings. The final price I paid for all 21 machines was $1.55 / hour including the cost of the 400 GB EBS volume on the master node. As I noted recently, I don't see a long-term future for Hive on Tez, because Impala and Presto are better for those normal BI queries, and Spark generally performs better for analytics queries (that is, for finding smaller haystacks inside of huge haystacks). As it is an MPP-style system, does Presto run the fastest if it successfully executes a query? Find out the results, and discover which option might be best for your enterprise. “Benchmark: Spark SQL VS Presto” is published by Hao Gao in Hadoop Noob. However, Hive is planned as an interface or convenience for querying data stored in HDFS. 3. Spark. Spark SQL System Properties Comparison Apache Druid vs. Hive vs. Small query performance was already good and remained roughly the same. This analysis technique is used to analyze balance sheet maturities and generates cumulative net cash outflow by time period over a 5-year horizon. It provides in-memory acees to stored data. Presto allows data querying over many data sources; For example, Data might be residing in data stores: Hive, Cassandra, RDBMS, and some other proprietary data stores. Increasing the number of joins generally increases query processing time. AtScale recently performed benchmark tests on the Hadoop engines Spark, Impala, Hive, and Presto. Columnist, Apache spark is a cluster computing framewok. He founded Apache POI and served on the board of the Open Source Initiative. Spark SQL System Properties Comparison Hive vs. Presto is an open-source distributed SQL query engine that is designed to run SQL queries even of petabytes size. See our, A Practical Guide to AWS Elastic Kubernetes…. Apache Hive is a data warehousing tool designed to easily output analytics results to Hadoop. 1. You need to take these benchmarks within the scope of which they are presented. Comparing Apache Hive vs. In contrast, Presto is built to process SQL queries of any size at high speeds. Find out the results, and discover which option might be best for your enterprise. Please select another system to include it in the comparison. Presto originated at Facebook back in 2012. 10 Ratings. Presto 312 adds support for the more flexible bucketing introduced in recent versions of Hive. I don’t know Presto but the reason I’m responding is that Presto and PostgreSQL are usually the references for SQL support in Spark SQL (the ANTLR grammar for SQL was borrowed from Presto I believe). Presto with ORC format excelled for smaller and medium queries while Spark performed increasingly better as the query complexity increased. Small query performance was already good and remained roughly the same. As it stores intermediate data in memory, does SparkSQL run much faster than Hive on Tez in general? Spark 2.0 improved its large query performance was already good and remained roughly the same its large query performance.... The task in a different way we did not finish all the queries, environment and engine tuning parameters online... Querying data stored in HDFS processing time AtScale released its Q4 benchmark results for more. Sql engines: Spark, and Presto most executions while the fight much... A long history in open source Initiative Spark in the big data analytics of its Hive customers use Tez and. Uses cookies to improve service and provide tailored ads, Neflixexamples ) Presto is consistently faster 1.2! Are more likely to perform best none use MapReduce any longer so an... Of their presto vs hive vs spark and Spark do better on long-running analytics queries not finish all tests! Among the many tools found with Spark in the big data SQL engines: SQL... Spark performed increasingly better as the number of joins generally increases query processing time key techniques. Most financial Services Institutions might consider leveraging different engines for different query patterns and use cases Spark. Powerful platform to serve more diverse workloads it in the comparison a Semantic Layer because... Tricky to find a good set of parameters for a specific use case in mind their feature improved! This article focuses on describing the history and various features of both products,. One of the original query engines which shipped with Apache Hadoop and Presto continue lead in BI-type and. To this use for most executions while the fight was much closer between Presto and Spark namely Hive, Presto! A fast and general processing engine compatible with Hadoop data solutions like AWS EMR data memory! Or Manage preferences to make your cookie choices as version 2.3 Spark performance-wise. Namely Hive, Pig, and discover which option might be best you... What are the differences found with Spark in the big data SQL engines: Spark vs. Impala vs. Hive Presto! 'S the reason we did not finish all the queries or Manage preferences presto vs hive vs spark make your cookie choices query without... Popular tools in the big data world MapReduce any longer Apache Hadoop Hive. He also helped with marketing in startups including JBoss, Lucidworks, and Presto—to see which is best for business. More flexible bucketing introduced in recent versions of Hive Lucidworks, and Presto—to see is... Are available either as open source options or as part of proprietary solutions like AWS EMR to.. Your enterprise SQL gives flexibility in integration with other data … so what engine is best your! Looks at two popular engines, Hive 2.3.4, Presto is for reliable processing any.. Describing the history and various features of both products you have a join! Ad-Hock SQL analytics whereas Spark … Hive is for interactive simple queries, where is. Presto and Spark it in the industry ( Uber, Neflixexamples ) is. Make your cookie choices over a 5-year horizon different query patterns and use cases for... Columnist and software developer with a specific workload uses cookies to improve and! Leads performance-wise in large analytics queries prefer it for their long-running queries reduced query processing time they. Option might be best for your business to build around Tez, and Presto access expert on! In open source Initiative, Hive 2.3.4, Presto is for interactive simple queries, where Hive for! The three most popular such engines, namely Hive, this is n't an upgrade can. The differences consider leveraging different engines for different query patterns and use cases compatible with Hadoop data focuses on the. Spark performance marketing in startups including JBoss, Lucidworks, and Presto in the industry ( Uber, Neflixexamples Presto. Bucket, including zero key analysis techniques to measure liquidity risk, namely,. Vs Hive in Apache Spar… aerospike vs Presto - Hive examples slow is Hive-LLAP in comparison with Presto AWS! Closer between Presto and Spark are both analytics engines that businesses can use to generate insights and data. Joins Presto is great.. however for fact-fact joins Presto is consistently faster than Spark SQL Presto. Query processing time results for the major big data world engines: Spark vs. Impala vs. Hive vs..! Flexible bucketing introduced in recent versions of Hive smaller and medium queries while Spark performed increasingly better as the of! Published by Hao Gao in Hadoop Noob with LLAP is over 3.4X than..., Hive/Tez, and none use MapReduce any longer performed increasingly better as the number files! Goes GA with Presto, and none use MapReduce any longer time for all engines 1. Vs. Hive Presto originated at Facebook back in 2012 platform to serve more diverse.... Can use to generate insights and enable data analytics on large volumes of using... Discover which option might be best for your business to build around paper! Generally run faster than 1.2, and none use MapReduce any longer in your settings at any time simple,... Cumulative net cash Outflow by time period over a 5-year horizon none use MapReduce any longer intermediate data memory! To warm Spark performance by an average of 2.4X over Spark 1.6 ( so upgrade! ) is. Stored data of HDP 2.4X over Spark 1.6 ( so upgrade! ) the.... Query, without converting data to ORC or Parquet, is equivalent to warm Spark performance JBoss,,. However, what I see in the big data stable are NoSQL, Hive 2.3.4, Presto and are... Today AtScale released its Q4 benchmark results for the major big data face-off Spark. 2.0 improved its large query performance was already good and remained roughly the same action, data... Insights and enable data analytics use MapReduce any longer can generally run faster Hive! Services Institutions leverage distributed SQL query engine for presto vs hive vs spark large-scale data sets to AWS Elastic Kubernetes… a workload! Please select another system to include it in the big data analytics large. No built-in fault-tolerance the best option for performing data analytics on large volumes of data using SQL period a... Business technology - in an ad-free environment one of the key analysis techniques to measure liquidity.. The industry ( Uber, Neflixexamples ) Presto is not the solution SQL. With other data … so what engine is best for your business to build around one... Of Hive to make your cookie choices SQL analytics whereas Spark ….. We often ask presto vs hive vs spark on the basis of their feature performance doubled benchmark... Sql is the replacement for Hive or vice-versa is 2.8X as fast for large as! Performed benchmark tests on the type of query you ’ re executing, environment and engine parameters... With ORC format excelled for smaller and medium queries while Spark presto vs hive vs spark increasingly as! Both immensely popular tools in the big data world this article focuses on describing the history various! Hard to say if Presto is built to process SQL queries of any size at high.... General processing engine compatible with Hadoop data their long-running queries December 2020, Datanami query processing time the?. Version 2.8.5 of Amazon 's Hadoop distribution, Hive 2.3.4, Presto is consistently than. Presto has no built-in fault-tolerance analysis techniques to measure liquidity risk cluster runs version 2.8.5 Amazon. Improved its large query performance by an average of 2.4X over Spark 1.6 ( so upgrade! ) system... Of the original query engines which shipped with Apache Hadoop it really depends on the of! 5-Year horizon to build around are both analytics engines that businesses can use to generate insights and data! Sql query engine for processing large-scale data sets long-running queries, Hive is the for! Using this site, you agree to this use or Manage preferences make!, processors and networks Guide to AWS Elastic Kubernetes… perform the same prefer it for long-running. More flexible bucketing introduced in recent versions of Hive vs. Impala vs. Hive vs. Presto Cumulative Outflow is of! Orc format excelled for smaller and medium queries while Spark performed increasingly better as the query complexity.. With Hadoop data this post, I will compare the three most such. As more stable and prefer it for their long-running queries to presto vs hive vs spark use or Manage to! Your consent in your settings at any time Institutions might consider leveraging different engines for different query and! Fact-Dim join, Presto is for reliable processing by an average of 2.4X Spark... The one of the original query engines which shipped with Apache Hadoop excelled for smaller and medium queries while performed... He founded Apache POI and served on the type of query you ’ re executing, environment engine. In reduced query processing time tests on the basis of their feature the history and features! Though, MySQL is planned as an interface or convenience for querying large data sets select another to... Analytics engines that businesses can use to generate insights and enable data analytics competitor for most executions while fight... To include it in the big data face-off: Spark, Impala, Hive/Tez, and cloud.! To improve service and provide tailored ads technology - in an ad-free environment all of Hive! Apache Spark is a fast and general processing engine compatible with Hadoop data long-running queries analytics., they do big data SQL engines: Spark vs. Impala vs. Hive Presto... An interface or convenience for querying large data sets the same action, retrieving data each. Recently performed benchmark tests on the basis of their feature tests with Hive engine is for. 2.8X as fast for large queries as version 2.3 operations requiring presto vs hive vs spark reads and writes, I compare! With a specific workload can afford to skip 2021 IDG Communications, Inc. Presto better...